Shame, Polarized Presidency, Trade Deals

Shame, Polarized Presidency, Trade Deals

Top of Mind with Julie Rose - Season 1, Episode 75

  • Jun 2, 2015 6:00 am
  • 1:44:52 mins
Download the BYURadio Apps Listen on Apple podcastsListen on SpotifyListen on YouTube

Is Shame Necessary? (1:04) Guest: Jennifer Jacquet, Ph.D., Professor of Environmental Studies at New York University, Author of “Is Shame Necessary?”  Shame and accountability are Top of Mind today. Sepp Blatter - the embattled and newly-re-elected president of soccer’s international governing body FIFA – made a surprise announcement today that he will step down. Even though he’s spent the last week refusing to do just that and denying that he had anything knowledge of the corruption and bribery that have led to indictments of more than a dozen officials tied to FIFA.  Blatter now says he’ll step down to help FIFA put the scandal behind it. But you could also make the argument that he’s resigning because he’s been shamed into it by public outcry in the press and on social media. We here in the West don’t tend to like the idea of shaming people into things and but there’s no denying its power.  New York University environmental studies professor Jennifer Jacquet thinks we should give shame a chance to solve society’s biggest problems. “Is Shame Necessary?” is the title of her new book.  Polarized Presidency (22:47) Guest: Robert Smith, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science at San Francisco State University, Author of “Polarization and the Presidency: From FDR to Barack Obama”  In America today, people who identify as Republicans are more reliably conservative than they’ve been in 20 years. And Democrats are more reliably liberal. In other words, we’re an increasingly polarized nation where politics are concerned. A new book co-authored by San Francisco State University political scientist Robert Smith looks at the role presidents have played in driving the parties apart. His conclusions may surprise you: Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Barack Obama are among the most polarizing by his measures. But JFK, LBJ and George H.W. Bush and were not.  The book is titled, “Polarization and the Presidency - from FDR to Barack Obama.”  The Apple Seed (43:22) Sam Payne is the host of BYU Radio's storytelling show,

Episode Segments

Polarized Presidency

Jun 2, 2015
20 m

Guest: Robert Smith, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science at San Francisco State University, Author of “Polarization and the Presidency: From FDR to Barack Obama”  In America today, people who identify as Republicans are more reliably conservative than they’ve been in 20 years. And Democrats are more reliably liberal. In other words, we’re an increasingly polarized nation where politics are concerned. A new book co-authored by San Francisco State University political scientist Robert Smith looks at the role presidents have played in driving the parties apart. His conclusions may surprise you: Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Barack Obama are among the most polarizing by his measures. But JFK, LBJ and George H.W. Bush and were not.  The book is titled, “Polarization and the Presidency - from FDR to Barack Obama.”

Guest: Robert Smith, Ph.D., Professor of Political Science at San Francisco State University, Author of “Polarization and the Presidency: From FDR to Barack Obama”  In America today, people who identify as Republicans are more reliably conservative than they’ve been in 20 years. And Democrats are more reliably liberal. In other words, we’re an increasingly polarized nation where politics are concerned. A new book co-authored by San Francisco State University political scientist Robert Smith looks at the role presidents have played in driving the parties apart. His conclusions may surprise you: Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Barack Obama are among the most polarizing by his measures. But JFK, LBJ and George H.W. Bush and were not.  The book is titled, “Polarization and the Presidency - from FDR to Barack Obama.”